L3:agent-orchestrated-delivery · AI Wing · Featured
Spec-driven delivery with AI coding agents
Written specs and constitutions guide parallel AI coding agents, with human review required at every merge.
- Role
- Workflow originator
- Period
- Mar 2026 to Present
Results
9+ repos
Repositories developed through the spec-first workflow
Based on repository analysis; other engineers have not yet adopted this workflow.
Verified800+ PRs
Merged pull requests during 2026
A throughput measure only. AI agents wrote much of the code under my specs and review.
Verified
Problem
AI coding agents can produce code faster than it can be reviewed. The workflow needed clear traceability from requirements to implementation and a review gate for every merge.
What I did
- I introduced GitHub Spec Kit with versioned constitutions and numbered specs linking task, acceptance and business-rule IDs.
- I wrote enforceable agent instructions and dated memory logs.
- I ran agents in parallel worktrees and integrated their changes through merge trains, requiring CI gates and human review for every merge.
Architecture
- HumanMeWrites specs and reviews changes
- DataSpec Kit specs and constitutions
- AICopilot and Claude Code agentsParallel worktrees
- ServiceCI gates
- ExternalMain branch
Data flow
- Me to Spec Kit specs and constitutions (write)
- Spec Kit specs and constitutions to Copilot and Claude Code agents (tasks)
- Copilot and Claude Code agents to CI gates (pull requests)
- CI gates to Me (review gate)
- Me to Main branch (merge)
Tech stack
GitHub Spec Kit
GitHub Copilot
Claude Code
GitHub Actions
L2 · Related career entryTechnical Consultant, Software & AI · Metrodata (PT Mitra Integrasi Informatika)